GMAT Score Ranges


The Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) is a standardized test used by business schools around the world to assess the qualifications of applicants for advanced study in business and management. The GMAT score is a crucial component of the business school application process. Understanding the GMAT score ranges, how they are calculated, and their implications can significantly impact your preparation and application strategy.

Understanding GMAT Scores

Overview of GMAT Scoring

According to WilsonGMAT, the GMAT consists of four main sections: Analytical Writing Assessment (AWA), Integrated Reasoning (IR), Quantitative, and Verbal. The scores from the Quantitative and Verbal sections are combined to generate the total GMAT score, which ranges from 200 to 800. The AWA and IR sections are scored separately.

Total GMAT Score

  • Range: 200-800
  • Components: Combination of Quantitative and Verbal scores
  • Score Distribution: Approximately two-thirds of test-takers score between 400 and 600

Analytical Writing Assessment (AWA)

  • Range: 0-6 (in half-point increments)
  • Components: One essay analyzing an argument
  • Scoring: Assessed by a human grader and an automated scoring system

Integrated Reasoning (IR)

  • Range: 1-8 (in single-point increments)
  • Components: 12 questions measuring data analysis and synthesis skills
  • Scoring: Based on the number of correct responses

Quantitative Section

  • Range: 0-60
  • Components: 31 questions assessing mathematical reasoning and problem-solving skills
  • Score Distribution: Most scores fall between 6 and 51

Verbal Section

  • Range: 0-60
  • Components: 36 questions evaluating reading comprehension, critical reasoning, and sentence correction
  • Score Distribution: Most scores fall between 6 and 51

Calculation of GMAT Scores

Computer-Adaptive Testing

The GMAT uses a computer-adaptive format for the Quantitative and Verbal sections. This means that the difficulty of the questions adjusts based on the test-taker’s performance. Correct answers lead to more difficult questions, while incorrect answers result in easier questions. This adaptive nature helps create a precise measure of the test-taker’s abilities.

Scoring Algorithms

The scoring algorithm considers the number of correct answers, the difficulty level of the questions answered, and the range of question types. The adaptive testing method ensures that each test-taker’s score accurately reflects their abilities.

AWA and IR Scoring

The AWA section is scored by both a human grader and an automated system. The scores from both are averaged to produce the final AWA score. The IR section is scored based on the number of correct responses, with partial credit awarded for multi-part questions.

GMAT Score Ranges and Percentiles

Understanding Percentiles

Percentiles indicate the percentage of test-takers who scored lower than a particular score. For example, a GMAT score in the 90th percentile means that the test-taker scored higher than 90% of all test-takers.

Importance of Percentiles

Percentiles provide context for GMAT scores, helping applicants understand how their scores compare to those of other test-takers. Business schools often consider percentiles when evaluating applicants to gauge their relative performance.

Breakdown of Score Ranges

Total GMAT Score Ranges

  • 200-400: Low scores, indicating a need for significant improvement in all areas.
  • 400-600: Below-average scores, suggesting moderate proficiency but areas needing improvement.
  • 600-700: Competitive scores, reflecting strong abilities with room for further enhancement.
  • 700-800: High scores, demonstrating exceptional proficiency and a strong candidacy for top business schools.

Quantitative and Verbal Score Ranges

  • 0-20: Low scores, indicating difficulty with the section’s content.
  • 21-30: Below-average scores, suggesting some understanding but needing improvement.
  • 31-40: Average scores, reflecting moderate proficiency.
  • 41-50: Above-average scores, indicating strong abilities.
  • 51-60: High scores, demonstrating exceptional proficiency.

AWA and IR Score Ranges

  • AWA: 0-2: Low scores, indicating significant issues with analytical writing.
  • AWA: 2.5-4: Below-average scores, suggesting some proficiency but needing improvement.
  • AWA: 4.5-5.5: Average to above-average scores, reflecting strong analytical writing skills.
  • AWA: 6: High scores, demonstrating exceptional analytical writing abilities.
  • IR: 1-3: Low scores, indicating difficulty with integrated reasoning tasks.
  • IR: 4-5: Below-average scores, suggesting some proficiency but needing improvement.
  • IR: 6-7: Average to above-average scores, reflecting strong integrated reasoning skills.
  • IR: 8: High scores, demonstrating exceptional proficiency in integrated reasoning.

Interpreting GMAT Scores for Business Schools

Average GMAT Scores for Top Business Schools

Top 10 Business Schools

  • Harvard Business School: Average GMAT score around 730
  • Stanford Graduate School of Business: Average GMAT score around 737
  • Wharton School (University of Pennsylvania): Average GMAT score around 732
  • MIT Sloan School of Management: Average GMAT score around 730
  • Chicago Booth School of Business: Average GMAT score around 730
  • Columbia Business School: Average GMAT score around 727
  • Kellogg School of Management (Northwestern University): Average GMAT score around 730
  • Tuck School of Business (Dartmouth College): Average GMAT score around 723
  • Haas School of Business (University of California, Berkeley): Average GMAT score around 725
  • Yale School of Management: Average GMAT score around 720

Score Requirements for Other Business Schools

Tier 1 Schools (Top 11-30)

  • Average GMAT scores range from 690 to 720
  • Examples: NYU Stern, Duke Fuqua, Michigan Ross, Cornell Johnson

Tier 2 Schools (Top 31-50)

  • Average GMAT scores range from 650 to 690
  • Examples: Indiana Kelley, Georgetown McDonough, Texas McCombs, USC Marshall

Tier 3 Schools (Top 51-100)

  • Average GMAT scores range from 600 to 650
  • Examples: Wisconsin School of Business, Ohio State Fisher, Maryland Smith

How Business Schools Use GMAT Scores

Holistic Admissions Process

While GMAT scores are a critical component, business schools use a holistic admissions process. They consider various factors, including undergraduate GPA, work experience, essays, letters of recommendation, and interviews. This approach ensures that they select well-rounded candidates who can contribute to their programs.

Weight of GMAT Scores

The weight of GMAT scores in the admissions process varies by school. Some schools place significant emphasis on GMAT scores, while others consider them one of many factors. Understanding the specific requirements of each school is essential for applicants.

GMAT Scores and Scholarships

Merit-Based Scholarships

High GMAT scores can enhance an applicant’s chances of receiving merit-based scholarships. Many business schools use GMAT scores as a criterion for awarding scholarships, especially those that recognize academic excellence.

Financial Aid Considerations

In addition to merit-based scholarships, some schools offer financial aid packages that consider GMAT scores as part of the evaluation process. A strong GMAT score can improve an applicant’s chances of securing financial assistance.

Strategies for Improving GMAT Scores

Preparing for the GMAT

Study Plans and Resources

Creating a structured study plan is essential for GMAT preparation. Test-takers should allocate sufficient time for each section and use high-quality study materials, including official guides, online courses, and practice tests.

Practice Tests and Question Banks

Taking regular practice tests helps identify strengths and weaknesses, allowing test-takers to focus their study efforts. Using question banks with a variety of practice questions can improve familiarity with the test format and question types.

Test-Taking Strategies

Time Management

Effective time management is crucial for success on the GMAT. Test-takers should practice pacing themselves to ensure they can complete each section within the allotted time.

Answering Strategies

Developing strategies for answering different types of questions can enhance performance. For example, learning techniques for quickly eliminating incorrect answer choices can save time and improve accuracy.

Addressing Weaknesses

Focused Study

Identifying and addressing weaknesses is essential for improving GMAT scores. Test-takers should allocate extra time to areas where they struggle and seek additional resources or tutoring if needed.

Review and Feedback

Regularly reviewing performance and seeking feedback can help test-takers refine their study strategies and make necessary adjustments. Using analytics from practice tests can provide valuable insights into areas needing improvement.

Common Misconceptions About GMAT Scores

Myth: Only High Scores Matter

Reality: Holistic Evaluation

While high GMAT scores are important, they are not the only factor in the admissions process. Business schools consider a range of criteria, and a well-rounded application can compensate for a lower GMAT score.

Myth: Retaking the GMAT is Always Necessary

Reality: Strategic Decision

Retaking the GMAT can improve scores, but it is not always necessary. Test-takers should consider their overall application profile and the specific requirements of their target schools before deciding to retake the test.

Myth: GMAT Scores are the Same Across All Schools

Reality: Varying Requirements

Different business schools have varying GMAT score requirements and expectations. Applicants should research the specific requirements of each school to understand the competitive score ranges.

Case Studies: GMAT Scores and Business School Success

Case Study 1: High GMAT Score and Admission to Top School


  • Applicant: John Doe
  • GMAT Score: 750
  • Undergraduate GPA: 3.8
  • Work Experience: 4 years in consulting
  • Target School: Harvard Business School


John’s high GMAT score, combined with his strong academic record and professional experience, helped him secure admission to Harvard Business School. His GMAT score was well above the school’s average, enhancing his competitive profile.

Case Study 2: Moderate GMAT Score and Holistic Admission


  • Applicant: Jane Smith
  • GMAT Score: 650
  • Undergraduate GPA: 3.6
  • Work Experience: 5 years in marketing
  • Target School: NYU Stern


Despite a moderate GMAT score, Jane’s strong work experience, solid GPA, and compelling application essays helped her gain admission to NYU Stern. The holistic admissions process considered her overall profile, demonstrating that a well-rounded application can succeed.

Case Study 3: Retaking the GMAT for Improved Score


  • Applicant: Michael Johnson
  • Initial GMAT Score: 600
  • Retake GMAT Score: 680
  • Undergraduate GPA: 3.5
  • Work Experience: 3 years in finance
  • Target School: Michigan Ross


Michael decided to retake the GMAT after scoring 600 on his first attempt. His improved score of 680 significantly strengthened his application, and he was admitted to Michigan Ross. The decision to retake the test paid off, demonstrating the value of perseverance and strategic improvement.

Future Trends in GMAT Scoring

Technological Advancements

Adaptive Learning and Testing

The use of adaptive learning and testing technologies is likely to increase, providing more personalized and accurate assessments of test-takers’ abilities. These advancements can enhance the precision and fairness of GMAT scores.

AI and Data Analytics

Artificial intelligence and data analytics may play a larger role in GMAT scoring, offering deeper insights into test-taker performance and potential areas for improvement. These technologies can also help identify patterns and trends in test results.

Changes in Business School Admissions

Evolving Criteria

Business schools may continue to evolve their admissions criteria, placing greater emphasis on holistic evaluations and diverse applicant backgrounds. This shift could impact the relative importance of GMAT scores in the admissions process.

Alternative Assessments

The emergence of alternative assessments and credentials, such as GRE scores and professional certifications, may influence the future role of the GMAT. Business schools may increasingly accept a broader range of qualifications.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *